Comments on: Two by Ian Monk http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/two-by-ian-monk { Derik Badman's Writing on Comics (mostly) } Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:59:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Ian Monk http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/two-by-ian-monk#comment-7072 Ian Monk Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:57:54 +0000 http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/two-by-ian-monk#comment-7072 Thanks very much for your sympathetically open review about your own likes and dislikes about the forms I've used. The only thing I found really funny was that I thought 'Twin Towers' was a poem when I wrote it! This may be a great case of where prose and poetry get hazy. Thanks very much for your sympathetically open review about your own likes and dislikes about the forms I’ve used. The only thing I found really funny was that I thought ‘Twin Towers’ was a poem when I wrote it! This may be a great case of where prose and poetry get hazy.

]]> By: Stephen Frug http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/two-by-ian-monk#comment-6818 Stephen Frug Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:41:32 +0000 http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/two-by-ian-monk#comment-6818 Interested readers can find a generous selection of Ian Monk's constrained writings -- not all of those collected in Writings for the Oulipo, I believe, but many of them -- online at Ian Monk's web site here: http://partal.com/vademecum/eng/llibres/1.html Included are Monk's "Homage to Perec" and his lipogramatic review of Adair's lipogramatic translation of Perec's lipogramatic novel. (Somewhere -- I don't have the link just now -- I recall seeing someone translate Monk's review into lipogramatic French, which would make it a lipogramatic translation of a lipogramatic review of a lipogrmatic translation of a lipogramatic novel. Phew!) Interested readers can find a generous selection of Ian Monk’s constrained writings — not all of those collected in Writings for the Oulipo, I believe, but many of them — online at Ian Monk’s web site here:

http://partal.com/vademecum/eng/llibres/1.html

Included are Monk’s “Homage to Perec” and his lipogramatic review of Adair’s lipogramatic translation of Perec’s lipogramatic novel.

(Somewhere — I don’t have the link just now — I recall seeing someone translate Monk’s review into lipogramatic French, which would make it a lipogramatic translation of a lipogramatic review of a lipogrmatic translation of a lipogramatic novel. Phew!)

]]>