<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Transitions Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4</link>
	<description>{ Derik Badman's Writing on Comics (mostly) }</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DerikB</title>
		<link>http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4#comment-17699</link>
		<dc:creator>DerikB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4#comment-17699</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4#comment-17446</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madinkbeard.com/blog/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4#comment-17446</guid>
		<description>Wow, quite the flattering breakdown of my essay Derik! My use of "linear" is related to both of the ways you ask. I mean it foremost as "one after the other," but also as "moments one after the other." 

I believe in the context of that quote, I meant it as "if you aren't presuming that panels right next to each other are related as moments in time, then there's no reason you should be limited to looking only at immediately juxtaposed panels at all." The "relational aspects" have to do with looking at the connections that are made between panels' content — immediately juxtaposed or otherwise.

Once I stopped looking at immediate juxtapositions, it lead me to the "Webdiagram" approach of grouping transitions in &lt;a href="http://www.emaki.net/ewovl.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Early Writings...&lt;/a&gt;, and that gave way shortly to abandoning transitions altogether (in the "Visual Syntactic Structures" chapters). Incidentally, much of the alterations of the theory came (and still come) from trying to apply it to actual sequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, quite the flattering breakdown of my essay Derik! My use of &#8220;linear&#8221; is related to both of the ways you ask. I mean it foremost as &#8220;one after the other,&#8221; but also as &#8220;moments one after the other.&#8221; </p>
<p>I believe in the context of that quote, I meant it as &#8220;if you aren&#8217;t presuming that panels right next to each other are related as moments in time, then there&#8217;s no reason you should be limited to looking only at immediately juxtaposed panels at all.&#8221; The &#8220;relational aspects&#8221; have to do with looking at the connections that are made between panels&#8217; content — immediately juxtaposed or otherwise.</p>
<p>Once I stopped looking at immediate juxtapositions, it lead me to the &#8220;Webdiagram&#8221; approach of grouping transitions in <a href="http://www.emaki.net/ewovl.html" rel="nofollow">Early Writings&#8230;</a>, and that gave way shortly to abandoning transitions altogether (in the &#8220;Visual Syntactic Structures&#8221; chapters). Incidentally, much of the alterations of the theory came (and still come) from trying to apply it to actual sequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
