<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Transitions Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madinkbeard.com/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madinkbeard.com/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4</link>
	<description>{ Derik Badman&#039;s Writing on Comics (mostly) }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerikB</title>
		<link>http://madinkbeard.com/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4/comment-page-1#comment-17699</link>
		<dc:creator>DerikB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madinkbeard.com/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4#comment-17699</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://madinkbeard.com/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4/comment-page-1#comment-17446</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madinkbeard.com/archives/rethinking-transitions-part-4#comment-17446</guid>
		<description>Wow, quite the flattering breakdown of my essay Derik! My use of &quot;linear&quot; is related to both of the ways you ask. I mean it foremost as &quot;one after the other,&quot; but also as &quot;moments one after the other.&quot; 

I believe in the context of that quote, I meant it as &quot;if you aren&#039;t presuming that panels right next to each other are related as moments in time, then there&#039;s no reason you should be limited to looking only at immediately juxtaposed panels at all.&quot; The &quot;relational aspects&quot; have to do with looking at the connections that are made between panels&#039; content — immediately juxtaposed or otherwise.

Once I stopped looking at immediate juxtapositions, it lead me to the &quot;Webdiagram&quot; approach of grouping transitions in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emaki.net/ewovl.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Early Writings...&lt;/a&gt;, and that gave way shortly to abandoning transitions altogether (in the &quot;Visual Syntactic Structures&quot; chapters). Incidentally, much of the alterations of the theory came (and still come) from trying to apply it to actual sequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, quite the flattering breakdown of my essay Derik! My use of &#8220;linear&#8221; is related to both of the ways you ask. I mean it foremost as &#8220;one after the other,&#8221; but also as &#8220;moments one after the other.&#8221; </p>
<p>I believe in the context of that quote, I meant it as &#8220;if you aren&#8217;t presuming that panels right next to each other are related as moments in time, then there&#8217;s no reason you should be limited to looking only at immediately juxtaposed panels at all.&#8221; The &#8220;relational aspects&#8221; have to do with looking at the connections that are made between panels&#8217; content — immediately juxtaposed or otherwise.</p>
<p>Once I stopped looking at immediate juxtapositions, it lead me to the &#8220;Webdiagram&#8221; approach of grouping transitions in <a href="http://www.emaki.net/ewovl.html" rel="nofollow">Early Writings&#8230;</a>, and that gave way shortly to abandoning transitions altogether (in the &#8220;Visual Syntactic Structures&#8221; chapters). Incidentally, much of the alterations of the theory came (and still come) from trying to apply it to actual sequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

